Political assassinations and more
December 1st, 2011 -- Posted in Tera system | No Comments »I was speaking with pals concerning the TERA political system, and away the best of the heads they mentioned it can be awesome if lords or avid gamers who maintain political energy from the fixture could possibly be assassinated/killed and shed their energy towards assassin. This is normally a pretty simplistic idea, however it seems awesome if it could somehow be implemented pretty and balanced.
Another thought I believed of to include to that can be to permit lords to appoint other avid gamers as their knights/guardians etc. and these avid gamers would obtain crowns or cloaks/ other components that display their status. Sort of like in L2 using the crowns.
Korean avid gamers are cunning, this can certainly not be well balanced in any way and only support seat extra energy gamers and bigger guilds in power. apart from the simple fact the fact that political method was broken before, most excellent not include points to produce it extra broke until after comfortably the line.
What concerning the intended coup de ta characteristics that had been pointed out previously in interviews. can you believe these sort of characteristics will sooner or later ensure it is in to the political system? can be excellent and exciting. And without a doubt you're most suitable my pretty simplistic thought is only a beginning stage for some thing that could hopefully be really viable in-game. It just sounded awesome when my buddy pointed out it.
What they are attempting to undertake using the political method would be to ensure it is feasible and desirable, that will take along the avid gamers prepared being involved, to participate to this method and really feel their immediate involvement w/o frustrating other avid gamers nor radically alter game-style. As I said, this sense of balance is less difficult to say it that really implementing it. I wish they will realize success in implementing the Political method as is meant to be. However, if we quote Chris, much better w/o some thing than with it and badly implemented.